Participants

59

Countries

25

Say funding for biomonitoring insufficient

65%

Rate transdisciplinarity as top priority

90%

Participants per event
Where participants come from
Gender identity
Professional category
Career stage
Role in biodiversity research (Davos, SRI)
Disciplines (CBC 2026, multiple answers allowed)
Is long-term biodiversity monitoring adequately funded? (0 = not at all, 4 = absolutely)
Is there value in adding a transdisciplinary dimension? (0 = not at all, 4 = absolutely)
Other funding opportunities people know of

16 of 27 answers were “No”. The 11 that named something are listed below.

What would move you from interest to engagement / co-funding? (Davos, IDSSD, SRI)
What barriers could prevent your participation? (Davos, IDSSD, SRI)
Who should be co-design partners? (keyword-coded answers)
Key factors for 30 by 30 (keyword-coded answers, Davos + SRI)
Which four topics should be discussed? (votes, 16 participants)
Full wording
Data & caveats

Questionnaires differ by event. Questions were matched by wording, not number. CBC 2026 asked about discussion topics but not about engagement or barriers; IDSSD covered both Arctic 3 (A3) and Biodiversity 3 (BD3); SRI’s barrier list had extra options. IDSSD labels the top of its 0–4 scales “3”; because the wording matches, it is plotted as 4. The headline percentages pool Biodiversity 3 responses only (IDSSD’s A3 answers are shown separately).

Small samples. Most questions have 5–16 responses per event. Treat everything as indicative.